What Is Cosmological Economics An Introductory Overview

Johannes Kepler’s Platonic solid model of the Solar system from Mysterium Cosmographicum (1596). Kepler is one of many who perceived the universe through universal ordering principles.

Cosmological Economics is a new and cutting-edge paradigm which integrates the principles of scientific cosmology with economic theory producing powerful applications in financial market analysis and forecasting. This field has emerged from a long tradition of investigation into correlations between universal order, mathematics and natural science on one side, and patterns of mass psychology and human behavior on the other. The fundamental premise of CosmoEconomics is that market movements are not random, and that through the use of cosmological ordering principles, financial markets are predictable!

We have compiled a long history of impressive forecasts and predictions that have been documented over 100 years, produced by a variety of analysts and forecasters with different approaches and skill sets, during different historical time periods. These analysts have left records of their market forecasts and financial models which have predicted market behavior with an accuracy that is far beyond the possibility of chance correlation. CosmoEconomics is the science behind such financial forecasting methodologies, elaborating both the theoretical foundations as well as the practical technologies through which such forecasts can be produced.

There are numerous approaches used to create such forecasts, such as cyclical analysis, energetic modeling, mathematical series, harmonic composition, geometrical projection, periodicity sequencing, structural analysis, sympathetic resonance and more. But the fundamental premise remains the same, that behind the phenomenon we call “the financial markets” lies a system of order that can be defined and predicted using the scientific principles which underlie certain systems of ancient, modern and alternative cosmology.

A predictive forecast for the US stock market in 1922 by the great W.D. Gann

Stock Market Science: The Subjective & Objective Fields

There are two primary fields of influence lying behind this science, an internal and an external, or a subjective and an objective. The core premise behind the subjective element is that the financial markets are essentially a “barometer of mass human psychology”. A market is nothing more than the measure of the conjoined summation of all thought and feeling behind or about the value of a particular entity or product like a stock or a commodity. Some markets are even comprised of non-real, conceptual entities like indexes or ETF’s, options and derivatives, which are just purely theoretical entities with absolutely NO physical existence whatsoever.

A “market” then, for any such entity, is the summation of all investment decisions engaged in by the mass of society “trading” that particular entity. And the “decisions” that are made through the buying and selling of stocks and futures of any kind, come directly from the mind, emotions, and overall psychology of the traders involved.

The Subjective Dimensions of Stock Markets Movements: Human Hopes, Fears & Indecision

That psychology is influenced by a wide range of factors such as study, intelligence, information, emotion, and experience, which vary from person to person, from moment to moment, and continuously shift and change according to the immediate circumstances of the individual and current situation of the world. Every individual continually processes a combination of both his own individual internal experience, and his external collective experience, these two elements engaging each other in an ongoing feedback loop. The entire collective body of traders or investors in any market engage in the same process, creating what we define as “mass human psychology.”

There are only three possible directions in which the market can move: up, down and sideways. Correlatively, there are only three summational influences of human psychology as applied to making a trading decision, which are hope, fear and indecision.

With hope, the market rises. With fear, it falls. And with indecision, it goes sideways…

Extreme forms of these would be euphoria and panic, which are what produce parabolic spikes and crashes. The model need not be complex, simply a range of three general psychological states with their three correlative market responses will serve to provide a general psychological theory of the markets.

Objective Dimensions: Supply, Demand, Politics & More…

The secondary or objective form of influence behind the markets is caused by external physical or social phenomena which will vary for each market, having greater effect on some and little on others. Here we are talking about elements like weather, war, political upheaval, supply, demand, natural disasters, government control, social trends, the business cycle, and all other such external factors which may influence the markets.

Beyond Duality: Pattern, Repeatability, & Cycle Theory

However, we do not necessarily consider these factors in the way that a fundamental analyst would. Whereas a fundamentalist would look at each of these elements as a cause in itself, we look at them more deeply, seeking a sense of possible order or even causation behind such elements, looking for patterns or influences which may directly or indirectly affect them.

For instance, when one examines either weather patterns or the business cycle, one can easily discover that these events occur according to regular time periods which can be explained by cycle theory. There are both long term and short term cycles which have been proven to influence weather patterns, though the actual cause is as yet still a field of active investigation.

The economic tides of mankind. This archetypal business cycle wave demonstrates how economies, and human nature repeat in predictable, cyclical fashion.

The Business Cycle

The Business Cycle, which by its very nature is defined as a cycle, and has been plotted out through history by many academic scholars, the ex-Fed Chair, Paul Voelker, even acknowledging the undeniable effects of its influence. But how often do you hear anyone ask whether there may be some kind of plausible explanation behind such a cycle, some potential cause? Is this not the next logical step in such a consideration? Yet very few seem to ask this question, as if a “cycle” were just an entity unto itself with no cause or correlation.

Asking “Why”?

It is exactly these kinds of causes and correlations that CosmoEconomics seeks to examine. Within this paradigm, such questions represent the next logical step in this field of exploration. We simply ask WHY?

• Why do weather patterns fall into regular cycles?
• Why can the Business Cycle even be defined as a cycle that has shown itself throughout history for 100’s if not 1000’s of years?
• Is this not the next logical step that a rational mind observing a phenomenon would ask about something that is, as yet, unexplained?
• Is it not within the purview of scientific method to engage in such inquiry and investigation?

By analyzing systems of ancient and modern cosmology, the science of CosmoEconomics examines the potential correlations between such seemingly disconnected events as financial markets or business cycles, being a mass social or psychological pattern, and natural phenomena, which are strictly governed by the laws of science and mathematics.

It asks the simple question: could there be an as yet undiscovered cause behind or correlation between these seemingly disparate events? And the answer we discover in our analysis is YES! Indeed, there is, at the very least, some kind correlation between these events that has been well documented over long periods of history!

CosmoEconomics: The Quest for Causation

Ultimately then, the field of Cosmological Economics seeks, at most, the discovery of an unknown, underlying system of cosmological order or causation behind mass social patternings like the financial markets, or at the very least, to provide some kind of explanation for this documented pattern of mysterious correlation between such phenomena. In either case, the results will inevitably define some unknown degree of order in what is currently considered by modern science to be a totally random or chaotic phenomenon.

Either discovery would be powerful, the lesser providing a valuable methodology for forecasting financial markets based upon the know correlations, even if the reason for those correlations remained unknown. But the former would be so radical as to inspire a revolutionary breakthrough in modern scientific, economic, and social theory, the like of which would force a complete reevaluation of the fundamental principles of science and the nature of reality itself.

Next Page

Related Pages